National Highways Authority Of India, Project Implementation Unit, Nashik v. Nilesh Prakash Mehta And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.36 OF 2019 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

VERSUS

NILESH PRAKASH MEHTA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Manorkar Deepak S Advocate for Respondent 1 : Shri Salunke M.V. ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: July 04, 2019 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

This matter was on board on 3.7.2019 and was posted to 18.7.2019 for removing office objections and passing orders. At 2.30 pm, learned Advocate for the appellant made a request that the issue could be resolved if the matter is kept today. Hence, it was posted on this date.

2.

The impugned order dated 17.6.2019 is with regard to leave granted by the trial Court to the respondents to withdraw the amount deposited with the competent authority at Dhule. Learned Advocate for respondent No.1 / claimant makes a statement, on instructions, that he would not withdraw the said amount till CMA No.158 of 2012 is decided. He further submits that the Contempt proceedings filed by him would not be pressed till such decision.

akl/d

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2- APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.36 OF 2019 3.

The Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the appellant is satisfied with this statement and this appeal can be disposed off.

4.

In view of the above, this appeal is disposed off by recording the statements of the respective sides as above. All contentions of the parties are kept open.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...

akl/d