The Vasantrao Naik Through Its Registrar v. The Vasantrao Naik Throuthe State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Anothergh Its Registrar

1 CA8603.2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8603 OF 2023 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) (ST) NO. 19002 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1615 OF 2023 The Vasantrao Naik through its Registrar ...Applicant

Versus

Ganpat s/o Maroti Sutare & Anr.

...Respondents

.....

Mr. M. N. Navandar - Advocate for the applicant Mr. A. V. Indrale - Advocate for respondent no. 1 .....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATED : 13th JULY 2023 PER COURT : - 1.

The learned Advocate representing the original petitioner appears on advocate'

s notice.

2.

Delay of 95 days is caused in filing the review petition. 3.

Heard the learned advocates for the respective sides. For the reasons set out, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. The learned advocate representing the original petitioner and the learned AGP, waive service of notice on behalf of respondents in the review application.

4.

Let affidavits-in-reply, if any, be filed on or before 04.08.2023.

2 CA8603.2023.odt 5.

List this Revision Application (Civil) (St) No. 19002 of 2023 on 10.08.2023.

[SANJAY A. DESHMUKH] [RAVINDRA V. GHUGE] JUDGE JUDGE SG Punde