Sagarsing Shivlal Rajput v. Salve Patil Tours And Travels, Through Its Proprietor Authorized Signatory, Ranjan Ganesh Salve

2024:BHC-AUG:23996 {1} alp108-24.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL BY PRIVATE PARTY NO.108 OF 2024 Sagarsing Shivlal Rajput APPLICANT

VERSUS

Salve Patil Tours AND Travels, Through its Proprietor Authorized Signatory RESPONDENT .......

Mr. Sudarshan J. Salunke, Advocate for the applicant Mr. V. P. Patil h/f Mr. R. P. Savale, Advocate for respondent .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 7 th OCTOBER, 2024 ORDER :

1.

Heard.

2.

Prima facie, the reasons assigned by the Trial Court while acquitting the respondent in the complaint filed by the applicant under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, are not appropriate. Hence, application is allowed. Leave is granted to file appeal against judgment and order of acquittal passed by learned 7th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in SCC No. 6363 of 2018.

3.

Office to register this application as appeal. 4.

Appeal be admitted.

{2} alp108-24.doc 5.

Mr. Savale, learned advocate waives notice for the respondent.

6.

Call for the record and proceedings.

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE drp/alp108-24.doc