Bombay High CourtWP/8107/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Padmaja Pandit Thakur And Others v. Sapan Sushilkumar Zunzunwala

2018-12-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar1 pages

rlj wp8107.18 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8107 OF 2018 PADMAJA PANDIT THAKUR AND OTHERS

VERSUS

SAPAN SUSHILKUMAR ZUNZUNWALA ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Dhorde Pramod P. Advocate for Respondent sole : Mr. Vijay Jagtap .....

CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J.

DATED : 12 DECEMBER 2018 PER COURT:- Te petitioners have questioned the valuation of the suit filed by the respondent plaintiff and consequently the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court of the Civil Judge hearing the suit. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing the matter for some time, states that the issue regarding proper/improper valuation be kept open to be urged at the time of hearing of the suit. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of keeping all contentions of the parties open, including that of valuation of the suit to be urged at the time of hearing of the suit. ( N. M. JAMDAR, J.) rlj/