Rajendra Uttamchand Katariya Died Thr Lrs Kalpana Rajendra Katariya v. The National Highway Authority Of India Thr Its Project Director And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:25621-DB 1 917,18,20,21.CA.8426.25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8426 OF 2025 IN WP/13669/2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.13669 OF 2021 RAJENDRA UTTAMCHAND KATARIYA DIED THR LRS KALPANA RAJENDRA KATARIYA AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER AND 918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8429 OF 2025 IN WP/13678/2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13678 OF 2021 RAJENDRA UTTAMCHAND KATARIYA DIED THR LRS KALPANA RAJENDRA KATARIYA AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER AND 920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8431 OF 2025 IN WP/13684/2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13684 OF 2021 RAJENDRA UTTAMCHAND KATARIYA DIED THR LRS KALPANA RAJENDRA KATARIYA AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER

2 917,18,20,21.CA.8426.25.odt AND 921 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8433 OF 2025 IN WP/13682/2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13682 OF 2021 RAJENDRA UTTAMCHAND KATARIYA DIED THR LRS KALPANA RAJENDRA KATARIYA

VERSUS

THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Patil Vijay Bhalerao AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. P.V. Diggikar Advocate for Respondent No.1 in WP in Sr. No.917 and 921 : Mr. D.S. Manorkar a/w. D.P. Madkar Senior panel counsel for respondent No.2 - UOI : Mr. Rahul Bagal, Mr. R.R. Bangar and Mr. N.T. Bhagat ...

CORAM

: MANISH PITALE & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 20.09.2025 PER COURT:

1.

By these civil applications, the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner in these petitions are seeking permission to be brought on record to pursue the writ petitions. The copies of the death certificate of the original petitioner i.e. Rajendra Uttamchand Katariya are placed on record along with the Civil Applications. The details of the proposed legal representatives are also specifically given in the applications. 2.

We have perused the contents of the applications. We are

3 917,18,20,21.CA.8426.25.odt satisfied that the applications deserve to be allowed in the interest of justice.

3.

Accordingly, the applications are allowed. The legal representatives, whose details are given in the applications, are permitted to brought on record in place of the original petitioner in all these petitions. Amendment be carried out within two weeks from today. (Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) habeeb/