Vimal Rajaram Dikshit v. Subhash Dhanpal Khot

908.CA.5012.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5012 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1842 OF 2013 Subhash Dhanpal Khot ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Vimal Rajaram Dikshit ..RESPONDENT ....

Mr. N.B. Deshpande, Advocate for applicant.

Mr. P.F. Patni, Advocate for respondent.

....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATED : 15th APRIL, 2016 ORDER :

1.

The applicant is wrongly shown as Vimal Rajaram Dikshit in the cause title of the application. Actually it is the respondent in the petition Subhash Dhanpal Khot who has filed this civil application as is evident from the application on page 7. 2.

The applicant shall accordingly correct the cause title of the application forthwith.

S.S.DESHPANDE 1 / 2

908.CA.5012.16.odt 3.

I have heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Counsel for the non-applicant who is the original petitioner.

4.

Though I was inclined to hear this petition today itself and Mr. Patni addressed the Court on the petition, however, when it came to the turn of the applicant, Mr. Deshpande prayed for time for preparation in the writ petition.

5.

In the light of the above, this civil application is allowed. List Writ Petition No. 1842/2013 for final hearing in the weekly final hearing board commencing from 20.06.2016. ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) S.S.DESHPANDE 2 / 2