Vimalbai W/O Dnyanoba Borade v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr District Collector, Jalna And ORS

1 951 to 953 ca 11526-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 951 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11526 OF 2022 IN FAST/18722/2022 ASHOK @ ASARAM SUDAM TANNPURE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR DISTRICT COLLECTOR, JALNA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. P. B. Rakhunde AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. S. S. Dande ...

AND 952 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11536 OF 2022 IN FAST/18701/2022 TUKARAM S/O BHIMRAO BORADE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR DISTRICT COLLECTOR, JALNA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. P. B. Rakhunde AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. A. B. Chate ...

AND 953 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11537 OF 2022 IN FAST/18711/2022 VIMALBAI W/O DNYANOBA BORADE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR DISTRICT COLLECTOR, JALNA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. P. B. Rakhunde AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. B. V. Virdhe ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 29/03/2023.

2 951 to 953 ca 11526-22 P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appears to be caused due to their poor fnancial condition.

3.

The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods. The acquiring body though served, but remained absent.

4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay. 5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

6.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-