Rahul Mohan Kakade v. The State Of Maharashtra

BA 1266.2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 918 BAIL APPLICATION NO.1266 OF 2020 RAHUL MOHAN KAKADE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sapkal Sandip R APP for Respondent : Mr.N T Bhagat Advocate for Assist To APP : Mr V. D. Gunale ...

CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.

Dated: December 08, 2020 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant, at length.

2.

It appears from the status report received from the trial Court that the prosecution evidence is completed and even the trial court has recorded the statement of the applicant and other co-accused persons under section 313 of Cr.P.C. Said Sessions Case is now posted for examination of the defence witnesses, if any. 2.

In view of the same, there is no reason to consider this bail application on merits. As per the directions aaa/-

BA 1266.2020.odt given by the High Court on its administrative side, physical hearing is now permitted before the Court below. Hence, following order.

O R D E R

Bail application is hereby rejected.

( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ...

aaa/-