← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6736/2012disposed offdismissed for default

Sagar Dilip Sadre U/G Dilip Nagorao Sadre v. The Education Officer(Pri) Zilla Parishad, Beed And ORS

2018-01-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora2 pages

1 WP - 6736-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6736 OF 2012 SAGAR DILIP SADRE U/G DILIP NAGORAO SADRE

VERSUS

THE EDUCATION OFFICER(PRIMARY) ZILLA PARISHAD, BEED AND ORS.

...

Mr. P.B. Salunke, Advocate h/f Mr. S.B. Kakde, Advocate for petitioner Mr V.C. Patil, Advocate h/f Mr. U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondent no. 1 Mr. U.S. Mote, Advocate for respondent no.3 Mr. V.V. Bhavthankar, Advocate for respondent no.4 ...

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & P. R. BORA, JJ.

DATE : 31-01-2018 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The petition has its genesis in the examination that was scheduled on 19-08-2012 and due to date of birth as on record has been causing some problem for appearance at the examination, the Petition had been moved. Six years have lapsed thereafter. Along with his main concern of appearance at the examination then, the prayer for correction of record in respect of date of birth appears to be an incidental prayer in the Petition having regard to the context in which the Petition had been moved.

2 WP - 6736-2012 3.

In the circumstances, learned counsel for petitioner states that with the passage of time, the purpose for which the Petition had been moved, had been rendered infructuous. 4.

In the circumstances, without hampering petitioner from taking recourse to the proceedings in respect of correction in date of birth, the Petition is disposed of as infructuous. [P. R. BORA] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE arp/