Subodhkumar Sudhakar Chaudhary v. The District Collector, Jalgaon And ORS

(1) 921- CA-9977-2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9977 OF 2021 IN FAST/19889/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9981 OF 2021 IN FAST/20045/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9982 OF 2021 IN FAST/20049/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9979 OF 2021 IN FAST/20056/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9980 OF 2021 IN FAST/20059/2021 RAMESH DAMU PATIL ....Applicant

VERSUS

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, JALGAON AND OTHERS .....Respondent .....

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Ajeet B. Kale AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. R. B. Dhaware Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Anand Dale h/f Mr. P.S Chavan and Adv. Subhash S. Chillarge for respective respondents.

.....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 06 FEBRUARY , 2025

ORDER

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicants in all these applications, are seeking condonation of delay of 45 days which appears to be caused due to

(2) 921- CA-9977-2021.odt their poor financial condition.

3.

The learned AGP as well as learned counsel for Acquiring Body, strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay. 4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay of 45 days in these applications stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest statutory benefits for the period of aforesaid delay. 5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

6.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) Y.S. Kulkarni