← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8656/2025disposed off

National Highways Authority Of India Thr Its Project Director v. Tukaram Raysing Pawara And Others

2025-09-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi3 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:26415

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 WRIT PETITION NO. 8653 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR

VERSUS

LAXMIBAI BABULAL PAWARA DIED THR LRS BAHADUR AND OTHERS ...

904 WRIT PETITION NO. 8654 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR

VERSUS

CHAMPALAL NAJLYA PAWARA AND OTHERS ...

905 WRIT PETITION NO. 8655 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR

VERSUS

VECHAN SURBHAN PAWARA AND OTHERS ...

906 WRIT PETITION NO. 8656 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR

VERSUS

TUKARAM RAYSING PAWARA AND OTHERS ...

907 WRIT PETITION NO. 8657 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR

VERSUS

DARSING SAKHARAM BHIL AND OTHERS ...

908 WRIT PETITION NO. 8658 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR

VERSUS

MISTAR CHOTU PAWARA AND OTHERS ...

909 WRIT PETITION NO. 8659 OF 2025 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR

VERSUS

TUKARAM KANA PAWARA DIED THR LRS SUMANBAI AND OTHERS Mr. Deepak S. Manorkar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V. M. Chate, AGP for the Respondent/State in all Writ Petitions Mr. R. B. Bagul, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 in WP Nos. 8655/2025 and 8656 of 2025 Mr. Rohit Sarvadnya, Advocate for Respondent UOI in WP Nos. 8653/2025 and 8654/2025 Mr. P. H. Patil a/w Mr. R. M. Patil, Advocate for Respondents/original Claimants in all Writ Petitions Mr. S. W. Munde, Advocate for Respondent UIO in Writ Petition Nos. 8657/2025 and 8659/2025.

CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2025 P.C. :- 1.

This motion is moved for speaking to the minutes of order dated 24th September, 2025.

2.

Inadvertently, the appearance of Mr. P. H. Patil a/w Mr. R. M. Patil, Advocate for Respondents/original Claimants in all Writ Petitions is remained to be mention. This being inadvertent error, prayer for speaking to minutes allowed. Necessary corrections be carried out and

corrected copy be uploaded accordingly.

3.

Motion for speaking to the minutes is disposed of. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp