Prasad Digambar Potdar (Suvarnakar) v. The Ex. Engineer, Latur Minor Irrigation Latur And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4173 OF 2020 IN X-OBJST/9689/2019 RUKHMINIBAI SAKHARAM KATAKE

VERSUS

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER LOWER TERNA CANAL DIVISION NO.1 NILANGA AND ANR ...

AND 917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6188 OF 2020 IN X-OBJST/19282/2019 WITH CA/6192/2020 IN X-OBJST/19289/2019 WITH CA/6193/2020 IN X-OBJST/19348/2019 WITH CA/6189/2020 IN X-OBJST/19357/2019 WITH CA/6186/2020 IN X-OBJST/19342/2019 WITH CA/6187/2020 IN X-OBJST/19353/2019 WITH CA/6190/2020 IN X-OBJST/19291/2019 WITH CA/6191/2020 IN X-OBJST/19286/2019 BAYANABAI BALIRAM SHINDE

VERSUS

THE EX. ENGINEER, LATUR MINOR IRRIGATION LATUR AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sakolkar Vijay G.

AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. B.

V.

Virdhe Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. S.C.Arora ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 15.11.2022 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants - claimants in all these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods as

mentioned therein for filing cross objections. The delay appears to be caused due to late receipt of compensation amount. Though the learned counsel for the Acquiring Body and learned AGP strongly opposed the applications, but considering the statutory right of the applicants, the respective delay periods, in all these applications, stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods if the amounts of compensation are enhanced.

2.

Cross-objections be registered after removal of office objections, if any.

3.

The applications are disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-