Salim Ahmad Tadavi And ANR v. Ajmal Chand Qureshi And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1063 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10416 OF 2016 IN FAST/20222/2016 WITH FA ST 20222/2016 SALIM AHMAD TADAVI AND ANR

VERSUS

AJMAL CHAND QURESHI AND AN ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr Bhokarikar Madhav M Mr Rajesh Meware h/f N.E.Deshmukh adv for respondent no.1 Advocate for Respondent 2 : Mr Mundada Vinodkumar ...

CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.

Dated: January 13, 2017 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Learned counsel submits that due to financial constraints, the applicants could not file the appeal within limitation and therefore delay of 116 days caused in filing the appeal. There is no intentional delay as such. 3.

I have also heard learned counsel for respondents. 4.

In view of the above submissions and for the reasons stated in the application, delay of 116 days caused in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. Civil application for condonation of delay stands disposed of.

5.

In appeal, issue notice to the respondents. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 waives notice. Mr. Mundada learned counsel waives notice for respondent no.2. Call record and proceedings.

( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) aaa/-