Raosaheb Yadav Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

952-CA-12077-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 952 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12077 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 19366 OF 2019 RAOSAHEB YADAV PAWAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. B.K. Pawar h/f. Mr. A.M. Hajare - Advocate for Applicant Mr. S.N. Kendre - AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 10th August, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 2106 days, which appears to be caused due to his poor financial condition. The learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the application on the ground that, there is also circulation delay. The acquiring body though served, but remained absent. 3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 2106 days in this application Pooja K.

1/2

952-CA-12077-2021 stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay and also for delay in circulating the matter belatedly. 4.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The civil application is accordingly disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2