Sunil S/O Sakharam Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Secretary Technical Education Department

(1) 920 CP-526.2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 526 OF 2023 IN WP/4149/2022 SUNIL S/O SAKHARAM PAWAR AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH SECRETARY TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ...

Mrs. Sunita Sonawane, Advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. Uma Bhosale, A.G.P. for respondent - State. Mr. Yogesh Bolkar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. ...

CORAM :

NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATED :

9 JULY 2025 ORDER:- 1.

Pursuant to the directions, respondent Nos.2 and 3 have decided representation of the petitioners belatedly. 2.

Learned advocate for the petitioners makes a grievance that gratuity amount is denied to the petitioners. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, they have alternate remedy to challenge the same. 3.

In view of compliance of the direction, contempt petition is disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde