Sachinabai Niplashya Bhosale @ Kanchan Kale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

902 wp.889.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

902 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.889 OF 2023 Sachinabai Niplashya Bhosale @ Kanchan Kale.

... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra.

2.

The Superintendent of Police, District Beed.

3.

The Police Inspector (In charge), Police Station Ashti, Tq. Ashti Dist. Beed.

4.

The Superintendent of Police, District Ahmednagar.

5.

Police Inspector (In charge), Police Station Karjat, Tq. Karat Dist. Ahmednagar.

6.

The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad Beed.

7.

The Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Takalsingh Tq. Ashti Dist. Beed.

... Respondents ...

Mr. Kamaloddin Nuruddin Farooqui, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. R. B. Bagul, APP for Respondent/State.

...

CORAM :

R. G. AVACHAT and SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE :

19th August, 2023.

Per Court:

.

The petitioner claims to be a tribal woman. She was a victim of a crime. She has been acquitted. Moreover, at her instance, a crime

902 wp.889.23.odt was also registered against someone else. The accused therein have also been acquitted. The petitioner herein claims compensation on account of her arrest and prosecution besides 13 days delay caused in registration of the FIR lodged by her and prosecuting the concerned with right earnest. In our view, the petitioner may approach the District Magistrate. Her claim, if any, shall be decided on its merits. With these observations, the criminal writ petition is disposed of. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] [ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ] nga