Sarjerao Narayanrao Solunke v. Chandrakalabai Sarjerao Solanke And Others

911wp8767.21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 WRIT PETITION NO. 8767 OF 2021 WITH CA/13065/2022 IN WP/8767/2021 CHANDRAKALABAI SARJERAO SOLANKE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS.

...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.M.N. Deshmukh AGP for Respondents-State : Mrs. M.A.Deshpande Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1, & 3 : Mr.Juili Gadkari h/f Mr. M.S.Jagtap Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr.Ingale Vivekanand V. ...

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SANDEEP V. MARNE, JJ.

DATE : 29.09.2022.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard both the sides.

2.

The petitioner is stated to be deserted wife of respondent No. 4 who is a pensioner. She is aggrieved by the nominating his sister to receive the retiral benefits. The petitioner seems to have moved employer with representation dated 21.10.2019 seeking a declaration about her right to have family pension and also a direction for appropriating her maintenance through the amounts payable to him.

3.

Admittedly, respondent No. 4 has retired on 31.07.2013

911wp8767.21 and by now must have received the retiral benefits. So far as the family pension is concerned, it would be the matter which cannot be pre-judged.

4.

There is no merit in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Needless to state that the petitioner would have her remedies else where.

5.

Civil Application is disposed of.

( SANDEEP V. MARNE ) ( MANGESH S. PATIL ) JUDGE JUDGE mahajansb/