← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/11416/2022disposed off

Sachin Vijayrao Deshmukh v. Archana Sachin Deshmukh

2022-08-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne2 pages

912 CA 11416 OF 2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11416 OF 2022 IN FCA/36/2020 SACHIN VIJAYRAO DESHMUKH

VERSUS

ARCHANA SACHIN DESHMUKH ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kathoke Sandesh D. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Yogeh D. Kale

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SANDEEP V. MARNE, JJ.

DATE : 05.08.2022.

PER COURT :

This is an application which in terms seeks modification of the order dated 29.10.2021 in Civil Application No. 2790/2021. 2.

The learned advocate for the applicant points out that multiple orders regarding payment of maintenance have been passed and the order directing the applicant-husband to deposit all the arrears may be modified or clarified to the effect that the wife would be entitled to claim maintenance collectively and not individually in respect of each proceeding. 3.

We are afraid, it is on a specific statement by the learned advocate before this Court that the order was passed directing him to deposit the entire arrears within six months and to pay the monthly maintenance regularly. If the order was passed on a statement made by the learned 1/2

912 CA 11416 OF 2022.odt advocate, he cannot be allowed to now resile from it and there is no question of any modification.

4.

The Civil Application is rejected.

5.

By way of last chance, the husband is granted time of two weeks to deposit of the entire arrears.

(SANDEEP V. MARNE J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/- 2/2