← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7116/2024disposed off

Radha Ramlu Tummod v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another

2024-07-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:13957-DB 1 922 & 923.WP-7115-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 922 WRIT PETITION NO.7115 OF 2024 RAJSHRI RAMLU TUMMOD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER AND 923 WRIT PETITION NO. 7116 OF 2024 RADHA RAMLU TUMMOD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner in both petitions : Mr. Thorat Chandrakant R. AGP for Respondents/State in WP-7115-2024 : Mr. P.P. Dawalkar AGP for Respondents/State in WP-7116-2024 : Mr. S.P. Joshi ...

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 11 JULY 2024 PER COURT :

.

The petitioners' proposals are awaiting adjudication by the Scrutiny Committee for validation of their tribe certificates since 29.12.2023.

2.

We are pointing out that few of their blood relatives have been directed to be issued with certificates of validity by separate orders at least two in number. Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are ready to adopt the reply filed by one of them to a report of vigilance cell.

2 922 & 923.WP-7115-2024.doc 3.

Considering the aforementioned fact, we dispose of the writ petitions by requesting the Committee to decide the proposals as expeditiously as possible and it may consider the request of the petitioners to adopt the reply filed by their cousin to the vigilance report.

4.

The decision shall be taken as early as possible and in any case within five weeks.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] Najeeb..