Tanaji Nivruti Bhosale v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through The Collector, Osmanabad And Others

( 1 ) 949 ca 7497.20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 949 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7497 OF 2020 IN FA/1554/2019 WITH CA/7499/2020 IN FA/1560/2019 WITH CA/7507/2020 IN FA/2237/2019 WITH CA/7500/2020 IN FA/1557/2019 WITH CA/7501/2020 IN FA/1555/2019 WITH CA/7503/2020 IN FA/1558/2019 WITH CA/7505/2020 IN FA/1559/2019 WITH CA/7510/2020 IN FA/2484/2019 WITH CA/7881/2019 IN FA/2484/2019 TANAJI NIVRUTI BHOSALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Patil Laxmikant C. AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. M.M. Nerlikar Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Vinod Patil for R/3 ...

CORAM : M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.

DATE : 07.01.2021 P.C.:- Heard both the sides. Shri Vinod Patil learned counsel for the respondent no.3 has objection for releasing the entire amount on the ground that enhancement is granted five times more than the amount awarded by the S.L.A.O. In view of this, 70% of the amount be paid to the applicants on the following terms:

a) 50% of the amount be paid on furnishing undertaking on usual terms. b) 20% of the amount be paid on furnishing solvent security to the satisfaction of the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

( 2 ) 949 ca 7497.20 2.

Civil Applications are disposed of.

[M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.] mub