← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7098/2006disposed offdismissed for default

Suman Gyandeo Thakur And ANR v. Maroti Bhimrao Kadam And ORS

2019-11-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav2 pages

907-WP.7098-06.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 WRIT PETITION NO.7098 OF 2006 SUMAN GYANDEO THAKUR AND ANR

VERSUS

MAROTI BHIMRAO KADAM AND ORS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. P.P.Mandlik h/f Mr. U.B.Bilolikar. AGP for Respondent-State : Mr. A.B.Chate.

Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Katneshwarkar. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. M.P.Kale.

Advocate for Respondent Nos.7 & 8 : Mr. R.J.Nirmal. ...

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATE : 27.11.2019 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2.

This Writ Petition pertains to the election of the year 2005 of the Village Panchayat Kantheshwar, Sategaon, Taluka Purna, District Parbhani. In connection with the said election, the Election Petition No.2 of 2005 came to be preferred before the Civil Court, Purna. The learned Judge of the Trial Court has allowed the Election Petition and set aside the election of the present petitioners. However, after the said election of the year 2005, twice the elections of the aforesaid Panchayat held.

907-WP.7098-06.odt Thus by efflux of time, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

3.

In view of the same, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed as infructuous. Rule discharged.

(V. K. JADHAV, J.) ...

vmk/-