Sayed Aslam S/O Sayed Yusuf v. The State Of Maharashtra

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3650 OF 2016 IN APPEAL/415/2016 SAYED ASLAM S/O SAYED YUSUF

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Thombre S.S.

APP for Respondents: Mr.A.V.Deshmukh ...

CORAM : V.L.ACHLIYA,J.

DATE : 22/08/2016 PER COURT :- Heard.

2] Perused the application and the judgment and order passed by the trial Court.

3] The trial Court has convicted the applicant for committing offence under Section 377, 506 of IPC and under Section 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. During the trial, applicant was not on bail.

4] Looking to the nature of evidence and heinous crime committed by the applicant, applicant does not deserve to be

-2released on bail. There is sufficient evidence to connect the applicant with the commission of offence for which he has been convicted. There is likelihood that the applicant may abscond if he is released on bail. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain request of applicant to release him on bail. Hence following order :

ORDER

Application is rejected. Hearing of the appeal is expedited.

2] The trial Court is directed to expedite the work of preparation of paper book. Call for record and proceeding with paper book.

(V.L.ACHLIYA,J.) umg/