The State Of Maharashtra v. Banshi Shankar Randhave

-:(1):- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9748 OF 2015 IN FAST/20154/2015 WITH CA/9750/2015 IN FAST/20215/2015 IWITH CA/9752/2015 IN FAST/20218/2015 WITH CA/9754/2015 IN FAST/20260/2015 WITH CA/9756/2015 IN FAST/20257/2015 WITH CA/9758/2015 IN FAST/20254/2015 WITH CA/9760/2015 IN FAST/20209/2015 WITH CA/9763/2015 IN FAST/20251/2015 WITH CA/9765/2015 IN FAST/20266/2015 WITH CA/9767/2015 IN FAST/20236/2015 WITH CA/9769/2015 IN FAST/20233/2015 WITH CA/9771/2015 IN FAST/20230/2015 WITH CA/9773/2015 IN FAST/20269/2015 WITH CA/9775/2015 IN FAST/20239/2015 WITH CA/9777/2015 IN FAST/20224/2015 WITH CA/9779/2015 IN FAST/20263/2015 WITH CA/9781/2015 IN FAST/20248/2015 WITH CA/9783/2015 IN FAST/20245/2015 WITH CA/9785/2015 IN FAST/20242/2015 WITH CA/9787/2015 IN FAST/20221/2015 WITH CA/9789/2015 IN FAST/20212/2015 WITH CA/9791/2015 IN FAST/20227/2015 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

VERSUS

BANSHI SHANKAR RANDHAVE ...

AGP for Applicant : Mr. C. V. Dharurkar.

Advocate for Respondent: Mr. K. D. Bade Patil. *** CORAM: T. V. NALAWADE, J.

DATED:

15th FEBRUARY, 2016.

PER COURT:

1.

Learned counsel Mr. Bade Patil submits that he is appearing for original claimants. Heard both the sides. 2.

The reasons like time required for processing the

-:(2):- matter and for getting various sanctions etc. are given. This Court holds that sufficient cause is shown. It appears that in similar matters, out of the same group, this Court had condoned the delay. So, the applications are allowed. Delay is condoned.

[T. V. NALAWADE, J.] Dt.15/02/2016.

ans/9748