Namdeo Devidas Sangole v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 8187.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8187 OF 2016 Namdeo Devidas Sangole .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri N. L. Jadhav, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri S. N. Rodge, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE : 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2016.

PER COURT :

.

Mr. Jadhav, the learned counsel submits that, the petitioner is claiming benefit of time bound promotion. The petitioner has given representations from time to time, however, no cognizance has been taken by respondents.

2.

The learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 submits that, the authority would decide the representations on its own merits. 3.

In view of that, we pass following order.

4.

The authority shall decide representations of the petitioner

2 wp 8187.16 Annexure H, I and J on its own merits, in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a period of four (04) months from today. The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. [ K. L. WADANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Sept. 16