← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5858/2023disposed off

Madarstul Falah Education And Welfare Society And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2024-07-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:13354-DB 913-wp-5858-2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 WRIT PETITION NO.5858 OF 2023 1.

Madarstul Falah Education and Welfare Society, Pimpla, Ta. Ambajogai, Dist. Beed. Through its Secretary.

2.

Shri. Someshwar Urdu Primary School, Pimpla (Dh.), Tq. Ambajogai, Dist. Beed. Through its Headmaster.

.. Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

2.

The Director of Education (Primary), Maharashtra State, Pune.

3.

The Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad Region, Aurangabad.

4.

The Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad, Beed.

5.

The Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Ambajogai, Tq. Ambajogai, Dist. Beed.

.. Respondents ...

Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for the Petitioners. Dr. K. B. Patil Bharaswadkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 - State. Mr. P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. ...

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND SHAILESH P BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 05 JULY 2024 [1]

913-wp-5858-2023.odt ORDER [Per Shailesh P. Brahme, J.] :- Heard both the sides finally.

2.

Petitioner No.1 Education Institution runs petitioner No.2 Primary School. They have submitted proposal seeking permission to run 5th to 8th standard by way of natural growth, on 27.04.2015. The proposal has been recommended by respondent No.4 Education Officer by letter dated 23.05.2017 and thereafter by further communication dated 18.06.2018. The proposal of the petitioners is pending with the respondent No.2 Director of Education, which is awaiting decision. This petition can be disposed of by issuing directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the proposal of the petitioners within stipulated period. 3.

Respondent No.2 shall decide the proposal of the petitioners within a period of four weeks on its own merits and communicate its decision to the petitioners.

4.

Writ Petition is disposed of.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [2]