Surekha Bapusaheb Gade And ORS v. Satish Shankar Sonawane And ANR

909-ca-8691-21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8691 OF 2021 IN FAST/19093/2020 SUREKHA BAPUSAHEB GADE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

SATISH SHANKAR SONAWANE AND ANOTHER ....

Mr. D.R. Adhav, Advocate for the Applicants Mr. A.S. Usmanpurkar, Advocate for Respondent no.2 ....

CORAM : SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 14th DECEMBER, 2021 PER COURT:- 1.

It is an application for condonation of delay moved by the applicants / original claimants.

2.

Heard Mr. D.R. Adhav, learned counsel for the applicants / original claimants and Mr. A.S. Usmanpurkar, learned counsel for respondent no.1. None present for respondent no.1 when matter is called out.

3.

There is delay of 66 days in preferring the first appeal.

909-ca-8691-21 4.

Having regard to the nature of dispute arising out of motor accident claim and for the reasons stated in the applications for condonation of delay in para nos. 4 to 7, the delay needs to be condoned.

O R D E R

(i) The application for condonation of delay is hereby allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

(ii) Registry to make scrutiny of the appeal and register the same as per due procedure, and thereafter, it be placed before the concerned Court for admission. (iii)The civil application is accordingly disposed of. [ SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI ] JUDGE S.P. Rane