← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7258/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Akhilbhartiya Sanskrut Pracharini Sanstha Through Its Secretary Laxman Nivrutti Munde v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-01-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

2. WRIT PEITITON NO.7241 OF 2015 WITH CA 15427/2015 WITH WP/7319/2015 WITH CA 15387/2015 WITH CA 17089/2015 WITH WP/7652/2015 WITH CA/15388/2015 WITH WP/7315/2015 WITH CA/15389/2015 WITH WP/7246/2015 WITH CA 15391/2015 WITH WP/7301/2015 WITH CA/15399/2015 WITH WP/7650/2015 WITH CA 15401/2015 WITH WP/7179/2015 WITH CA/15404/2015 WITH WP/7646/2015 WITH CA/15407/2015 WITH WP/7251/2015 WITH CA/15428/2015 WITH WP/7243/2015 WITH CA 15429/2015 WITH WP/8862/2015 WITH CA/15431/2015 WITH WP/7647/2015 WITH CA/15433/2015 WITH WP/7258/2015 WITH CA/15434/2015 WITH WP/7316/2015 WITH CA/15435/2015 WITH WP/7244/2015 WITH CA/15436/2015 WITH WP/7318/2015 WITH CA/15437/2015 WITH WP/7314/2015 WITH CA 15398/2015 WITH CA 17092/2015 WITH WP/7311/2015 WITH CA/15414/2015 WITH CA 17090/2015 WITH WP/7312/2015 WITH CA 15400/2015 WITH CA/17088/2015 WITH WP/7250/2015 WITH CA/15432/2015 WITH WP7313/2015 WITH CA/15411/2015 WITH CA/17091/2015 WITH WP 7683/2015 WITH CA/15395/2015 WITH CA/17093/2015 WITH WP7317/2015 WITH CA/15430/2015 WITH CA/17094/2015

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

VERSUS

MAGAS SAMAJ SEVA MANDAL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY ...

Mr. NP Patil Jamalpurkar, Advocate for petitioners Mr.SB Yawalkar,AGP for Respondents/State __________ CORAM :

S.S.SHINDE & P.R.BORA,JJ.

DATE : 11 th January, 2016.

PER COURT :

1) Heard. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that in case there is any deficit court fees to be paid in any of the matters, the same will be deposited within a period of six weeks from today.

2) Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners further submits that in all these petitions, as per the assessment orders, which are placed on record, the assessed amount has been sanctioned and disbursed by the Respondent/State. He, therefore, submits that nothing further survives for consideration in these writ petitions.

3) Learned AGP appearing for the State submits that in case there is any delay in compliance of the interim directions issued by this Court, the civil applications may kindly be allowed so as to extend time till the amount is actually disbursed.

4) Since the Respondent/State has already disbursed the amount after necessary verification, keeping in view the assessment orders passed by the

State authorities, in our opinion, no further orders are necessary in these petitions. In case there is any delay in compliance of the interim directions issued by this Court, to that extent, till the disbursement of the amount, time stands extended. Respective Civil Applications are disposed of. 5) We hope and expect that, in future, the State Government, keeping in view of the object of The juvenile Justice (Care and protection of Children) Act, 2000 will try to timely release the amount.

5) With these observations, the writ petitions are disposed of. Pending Civil Applications, if any, are disposed of.

(P.R.BORA) (S.S.SHINDE) JUDGE JUDGE bdv/