← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9815/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Pramod Murlidhar Khedkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2017-08-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 10 WRIT PETITION NO. 9815 OF 2017 PRAMOD MURLIDHAR KHEDKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R.B. Narvade Patil AGP for Respondent 1/State : Mr. S.B. Yawalkar Advocate for Respondent 2 : Mr. R.K. Ingole ...

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & N.W. SAMBRE, JJ.

DATED : August 7, 2017.

PER COURT :

.

After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit detail representation with supporting documents before the State Government for invoking the powers under section 45 (2) (4) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

2.

With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn.

3.

Needless to state that in case the representation is submitted by the petitioner, the competent authority of the State Government shall look in to it and shall take appropriate steps in accordance with law.

[N.W. SAMBRE, J.] [SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.] ssc/