← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/11645/2022admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Ramdas Baburao Gorade v. The Exe. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Div. No.1, Midc, Aurangabad And Another

2022-09-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Dige4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11645 OF 2022 IN FA/4424/2016 RAMDAS BABURAO GORADE THE EXE. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. NO.1, MIDC, Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Pahune Patil Nandkishor J. And S.n. Pahune Patil AGP for Respondents: Mr. S. S. Dande Advocate for respondent No.1 : Mr. B. R. Surwase CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11646 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 4427 OF 2016 MADHAVRAO SAHEBRAO GORADE SINCHAN BHAVAN, AURANGABAD AND ANR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13249 OF 2022 IN FA/3712/2016 ASHOK TEJRAO AHER AND ANOTHER AGP for Respondents: Mr. A. B. Chate ...

907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13250 OF 2022 IN FA/4415/2016

DAULATRAO SANDU MAGAR AGP for Respondents: Mr. P. M. Kulkarni Advocate for respondent No.2 : Mr. B. R. Surwase .....

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13251 OF 2022 IN FA/4428/2016 WITH CA/6674/2019 IN FA/4428/2016 SARJERAO DEORAO JADHAV Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Pahune Patil Nandkishor J. And S.n. Pahune Patil AGP for Respondents: Mr. S. S. Dande .....

909 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13252 OF 2022 IN FA/4426/2016 FAKIRA SHESHRAO AHER AND ORS Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Pahune Patil Nandkishor J. AGP for Respondents: Mrs. D. S. Jape 910 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13253 OF 2022 IN FA/4423/2016 SUSHILABAI SARJERAO JADHAV Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Pahune Patil Nandkishor J. AGP for Respondents: Mr. A. B. Chate ...

911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13254 OF 2022 IN FA/3711/2016 RAJU RAMRAO AHER Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Pahune Patil Nandkishor J. AGP for Respondents: Mr. P. M. Kulkarni .....

912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13255 OF 2022 IN FA/4422/2016 DIGAMBAR LAXMAN GORADE AND ANR AGP for Respondents: Mr. S. S. Dande CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J.

DATE : 20.09.2022 PER COURT :- Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for respondents.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that appeals filed bl the applicants are disposed of before the Lok Adalat. The respondent has deposited award amount as per settlement before this Court. Hence applicants be permitted to withdraw

the said amount.

3.

Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that appropriate order be passed.

4.

Considering submission of both the learned counsel, I pass the following order.

ORDER

Application is allowed in terms of praler clause (B). ( S.G. DIGE,) JUDGE lsk