Bhima Mahalappa Fadtale v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Osmanabad And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10060 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2826 OF 2019 Sahadeo Dhondiba Kamble, Died L.Rs.

Sindhubai Sahadeo Kamble & ors.

... APPLICANTS

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

... RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. A.B. Kale, Advocate for applicants Mr. P.M. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for respondents No.1 and 2 Mr. A.M. Gaikwad, Advocate for respondent No.3. .......

AND CA NO.10063/2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2828/2019, CA NO.10059/2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2831/2019, CA NO.10064/2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2829/2019, . . . .

CORAM :

R. G. AVACHAT, J.

DATE :

24th September, 2021 PER COURT :

Heard learned counsel for the parties. The increase is said to have been six times. Moreover, compensation for the fruit bearing trees has been granted assuming the trees to be fully grown up when the same were in the stage of seedlings only. In view of the same, the applicant is permitted to withdraw 60% of the amount deposited on furnishing usual undertaking. Civil Applications are disposed of.

( R. G. AVACHAT ) JUDGE fmp/-