Bombay High CourtWP/78/2022disposed off

Kashinath Sandu Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2022-02-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Dige3 pages

1 905-wp 47-2022+.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 47 OF 2022 Sheshrao Baburao Sakhle .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Mr. Sanket Joshi, Advocate h/f Mr. Ashok A. More, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondents-State.

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 78 OF 2022 Kashinath Sandu Kamble .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Mr. Sanket Joshi, Advocate h/f Mr. Ashok A. More, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for Respondents-State.

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 754 OF 2022 Bajirao Laxman Tupe .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Mr. Sanket Joshi, Advocate h/f Mr. Ashok A. More, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondents-State.

2 905-wp 47-2022+.odt AND WRIT PETITION NO. 760 OF 2022 Sahebrao Fakira Lakkas .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Mr. Sanket Joshi, Advocate h/f Mr. Ashok A. More, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. S. P. Tiwari, AGP for Respondents-State.

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2252 OF 2022 Akash Bhausaheb Garud .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Mr. Sanket Joshi, Advocate h/f Mr. Ashok A. More, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondents-State.

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2256 OF 2022 Ambadas Hanumanta Janjal .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Mr. Sanket Joshi, Advocate h/f Mr. Ashok A. More, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for Respondents-State.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & S. G. DIGE, JJ.

DATED : 16th FEBRUARY 2022.

3 905-wp 47-2022+.odt PER COURT:- .

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents-authorities are not executing the recovery certificates in favour of the petitioners and against respondent No. 4. 2.

It is for the respondents-authorities to execute the recovery certificates in accordance with law, keeping in mind existence of charge over the property and rights of other creditors, if any. 3.

The respondents-authorities may execute the recovery certificates expeditiously, keeping in view of the aforesaid facts. 4.

Writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

( S. G. DIGE ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE P.S.B.