Rukhsana Mohammad Abed v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:19774 *1* 22aba811o25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 811 OF 2025 SIDDIQUI ASFAHAN MOHD ZULFEKHARUDDIN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Shri Ubaid S. Hashmi, Advocate h/f Shri Dodiya Ramankumar G. and Shri Vishal A. Chavan, Advocates for the Applicant. Ms. M.L. Sangit, APP for the Respondents/State. ...

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2311 OF 2025 IN ABA/811/2025 RUKHSANA MOHAMMAD ABED

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Shri Kakani Rohit R., Advocate for the Applicant. ...

CORAM : ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.

DATE : 28 July 2025 P. C. :- 1.

Heard the learned Advocates for the parties.

2.

The learned Advocate for the Applicant states, on instructions, that during the pendency of this Anticipatory Bail Application, there is subsequent development that the Applicant has been arrested. As such, the Application has become

*2* 22aba811o25 infructuous. The learned Advocate, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the Application.

3.

Leave is granted.

4.

The Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

The pending Criminal Application does not survive and stands disposed of.

kps ( ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. )