← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9630/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Ratnamalabai Sunil Sadashive v. Sunil Magan Sadashive

2019-01-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice T.V. Nalawade,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal2 pages

907- C.A. No. 9630-2018.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9630 OF 2018 IN FCAST/20396/2018 RATNAMALABAI SUNIL SADASHIVE ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

SUNIL MAGAN SADASHIVE ..RESPONDENT ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. P.S. Shinde Advocate for the respondent : Mrs. K.P. Mutatkar ...

CORAM

:T.V. NALAWADE AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL,JJ.

DATE : 25th JANUARY, 2019.

PER COURT :- Learned counsel Mrs. K.P. Mutatkar submits that she is filing appearance for the respondent husband. The present application is filed for condonation of delay of 689 days caused in filing appeal against the Judgment and order in Petition No. A-84/2016 which was pending in the Family Court, Aurangabad. The proceeding was filed for divorce by the present appellant, but it came to be dismissed. In view of the contentions made in the applications and submissions made this Court holds that sufficient cause is shown and appeal is allowed and delay is condoned.

2.

Appeal is admitted.

3.

Notice after admission of appeal is given to the respondent. 4.

Call Record and Proceeding. If any party is interested in early

907- C.A. No. 9630-2018.odt hearing, the parties are liberty to prepare private paper book and file. 5.

List the matter on 11.02.2019.

[SUNIL K. KOTWAL] [T.V. NALAWADE] JUDGE JUDGE YSK/