Swati Shashikant Kulkarni v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

916 wp.8993.21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

916 WRIT PETITION NO.8993 OF 2021 SWATI SHASHIKANT KULKARNI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Adinath B. Jagtap. AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. P. Tiwari.

Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. A. R. Nikam. ...

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE :

18th August, 2021.

P.C.:

1.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was given postings at different Zilla Parishads from time to time but the concerned Zilla Parishad is not allowing her to join. The respondents have initiated the process for granting appointments / postings.

2.

The eligibility of the petitioner is not disputed. 3.

In view of the above, this petition is disposed of. Considering that the respondents have acknowledged the eligibility and the selection of the petitioner, we expect that the respondents would

916 wp.8993.21.odt take a decision with promptitude and preferably on or before 30.10.2021 since the academic year 2021-2022 has commenced and the schools are gradually opening in a phased manner. 4.

Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

[ R. N. LADDHA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] nga