Purushottam Sadashiv Jawale v. Anil Kumar Raghunath Chaudhari

928 CA 3308-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3308 OF 2021 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 19872 OF 2019 PURUSHOTTAM SADASHIV JAWALE

VERSUS

ANIL KUMAR RAGHUNATH CHAUDHARI ...

Mr. Rahul P. Dhase - Advocate for sole Respondent ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 21st August, 2024 PER COURT :

1.

None present for applicant.

2.

The record shows that, advocate on record for applicant - Mr. Girish V. Wani had already submitted that, the applicant had taken back all the documents from him. This fact is reflected in order dated 18.06.2024 passed by this Court. Thereafter on 09.07.2024 this Court has observed that, the applicant is not interested in prosecuting this application as well as appeal and, therefore granted last chance mentioning that, if the matter was not argued it would be dismissed for default.

3.

Today also the applicant remained absent and therefore, as per Pooja K.

1/2

928 CA 3308-2021 the earlier order the application alongwith Second Appeal (St.) stands dismissed for default.

[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2