← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8915/2021disposed off

Vivek Laxman Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2021-08-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha4 pages

.. 1 ..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 994 WRIT PETITION NO.8912 OF 2021 RAMDHAN THAWRA RATHOD .. Petitioner

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..Respondents Mr C.T. Jadhav, Advocate h/f. Mr Ajay D. Pawar, Advocate for Petitioner Mr S.B. Pulkundwar, AGP for the respondents-State AND 995 WRIT PETITION NO.8913 OF 2021 BABAN PURAJI RATHOD AND ANOTHER .. Petitioners

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..Respondents Mr C.T. Jadhav, Advocate h/f. Mr Ajay D. Pawar, Advocate for Petitioners Mr S.K. Tambe, AGP for the respondents-State 996 WRIT PETITION NO.8914 OF 2021 SULOCHANA NARAYAN RATHOD .. Petitioner

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..Respondents Mr C.T. Jadhav, Advocate h/f. Mr Ajay D. Pawar, Advocate for Petitioner Mr A.R. Kale, AGP for the respondents-State 997 WRIT PETITION NO.8915 OF 2021 VIVEK LAXMAN PATIL .. Petitioner

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..Respondents

.. 2 ..

Mr C.T. Jadhav, Advocate h/f. Mr Ajay D. Pawar, Advocate for Petitioner Mr S.G. Karlekar, AGP for the respondents-State 998 WRIT PETITION NO.8916 OF 2021 SANDIP LAHU SALUNKE AND OTHERS .. Petitioners

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..Respondents Mr C.T. Jadhav, Advocate h/f. Mr Ajay D. Pawar, Advocate for Petitioners Mr K.N. Lokhande, AGP for the respondents-State 999 WRIT PETITION NO.8917 OF 2021 SHAIKH MAINODDIN CHOTUMIYA AND ANOTHER .. Petitioners

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..Respondents Mr C.T. Jadhav, Advocate h/f. Mr Ajay D. Pawar, Advocate for Petitioners Mrs V.N. Patil - Jadhav, AGP for the respondents-State 1000 WRIT PETITION NO.8918 OF 2021 SUBHASH SHESHERAO BIRADAR & OTHERS .. Petitioners

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ..Respondents Mr C.T. Jadhav, Advocate h/f. Mr Ajay D. Pawar, Advocate for Petitioners Mr S.P. Tiwari, AGP for the respondents-State ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R.N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE : 13-08-2021

.. 3 ..

PER COURT : - 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the respective learned AGPs.

2.

The grievance of the petitioners is that the benefit of time bound promotion, higher pay scale of ACPS is not given to the non-teaching staff (Class III, Class IV) of Ashram Schools run by the Tribal Development Department and Social Welfare Department. 3.

The issue is no longer res-integra, in view of the catena of judgments of this Court, reference can be had to the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No.4202 of 2012 with connected matters decided on 21.01.2014 and Writ Petition No.5191 of 2018 with connected Writ Petition dated 06.06.2018 we follow same course. "4.

In light of the above, we pass the following order: (I) We declare that the benefit of ACPS, which is applicable to the employees of Group C and D non-teaching staff of the aided Private Schools in the State under the Govt. Resolution dated 30th April, 1998 as modified from time to time shall be available to the nonteaching staff of the same category in the private aided Ashram Schools;

.. 4 ..

(II) The appropriate authority appointed by the State Govt. shall examine the individual cases of the petitioners for deciding whether they satisfy the criteria laid down for availability of the benefit of ACPS to the private aided Govt. schools under the Govt. Resolution dated 30th April, 1998 as modified from time to time;

(III) We make it clear that the petitioners will be entitled to the benefit of the said scheme, provided they satisfy the eligibility criteria which is prescribed for the corresponding non-teaching staff of the private aided schools;

(IV) We grant time of six months to the respondents to scrutinize the cases of the members of the petitioners and to consider whether they are eligible for the benefit of ACPS;

(V) To those petitioners who are found eligible, the benefit shall be extended, as expeditiously as possible; (VI) The Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs." 4.

Writ Petitions accordingly disposed of. No costs. [ R.N. LADDHA ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE