← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/8915/2019disposed off

Narayan Nama @ Namdeo Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2022-07-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Dige3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8915 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 20425 OF 2018 NARAYAN NAMA @ NAMDEO GAIKWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8907 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 20840 OF 2018 NAGESH DNYANOBA KADAM AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8909 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 20838 OF 2018 RAOSAHEB ROKDOBA GAIKWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8911 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 20844 OF 2018 SHESHERAO NAMA @ NAMDEO GAIKWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8912 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 20846 OF 2018 GAUTAM VITHAL GAIKWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8913 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 20848 OF 2018 NATHRAO DNYANOBA KADAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8914 OF 2019 IN FAST NO. 20842 OF 2018 SADHU ROKDOBA GAIKWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8916 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 20850 OF 2018 VITHAL KISHAN GAIKWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8918 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 20852 OF 2018 MAHADU @ MADHAV ROKDOBA GAIKWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER .....

Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. H. B. Nandavale AGP for Respondent State : Mr. P. M. Kulkarni Advocate for respondent No.2 : Mr. Chetan T. Jadhav, h/f Mr. S.G. Bhalerao .......

CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J.

DATE : 14.07.2022 PER COURT :- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGP and learned counsel for respondent No.2.

2.

Considering submissions of learned counsel and reasons mentioned in the application, delay for fling First Appeal is condoned. Applicant shall not claim interest and statutory benefts for delayed period. Applicant shall fle afdavit in that regard. Application is allowed.

3.

Appeal be registered.

( S.G. DIGE,) JUDGE ysk