Pundlik Lingram Ugile Died Thr Lrs. Pandharinath S/O Pundlik Ugile v. The Ex. Engineer, Latur Min. Irri., Latur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9930 OF 2019 IN X-OBJST/19787/2019 IN FA/3365/2018 WITH CA/10375/2022 IN X-OBJST/19785/2019 IN FA/3364/2018 WITH CA/709/2022 IN X-OBJST/20289/2019 IN FA/3358/2018 WITH CA/7460/2020 IN X-OBJST/19790/2019 IN FA/3363/2018 WITH CA/9453/2019 IN X-OBJST/19797/2019 IN FA/3366/2018 WITH CA/5214/2022 IN X-OBJST/19410/2020 FA/3359/2018 WITH CA/9446/2019 IN X-OBJST/19799/2019 IN FA 3367/2018 ARUN DAMODAR SHIRNEWAR

VERSUS

THE EX. ENGINEER, LATUR MINOR IRRIGATION LATUR AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Sakolkar Vijay G.

and Mr. H.B. Nandagavale Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. C. Arora AGP for Respondent - State : Mr. P. M. Kulkarni ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 15.11.2022 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants - claimants in all these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned therein for filing cross objections. The delay appears to be caused due to late receipt of compensation amount. Though the learned counsel for the Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications, but considering the statutory right of the applicants, the respective delay periods, in all these applications, stand condoned

subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods, if the amounts of compensation are enhanced.

2.

Cross-objections be registered after removal of office objections, if any.

3.

The applications are disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-