Jagan Bindaprasad Shukla v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 904-CP-693-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.693 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1155/2017 JAGAN BINDAPRASAD SHUKLA ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS Mr D.A. Naik, Advocate for Petitioner Mr S.G. Sangle, AGP for Respondents-State Mr J.R. Shah, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2020 PER COURT :

The learned Counsel Mr Shah, appearing for Respondent No. 3 - the Administrative Ofcer Mr C.A. Abhange in the Administration Department, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad made a statement before this Court that, on instructions provided by Mr Abhange, who is personally present in this Court, as well, the Law Ofcer of the Municipal Corporation, who is also personally present in this Court that due to some administrative difculties, though the representation of the petitioner is decided, same was not communicated to the petitioner. As such, the necessary steps so as to communicate

2 904-CP-693-2019 the decision to the petitioner would be taken within two weeks. The statement made before this Court on the instructions of respondent No. 3, who is personally present is accepted as an undertaking before this Court. In view of this statement, which is accepted as an undertaking before this Court, the grievance of the petitioner no more survives. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of.

[ ANIL S. KILOR ] [ PRASANNA B. VARALE ] JUDGE JUDGE mta