Bhausaheb S/O Vishnu Ghodake v. The State Of Maharashtra

{1} 940 sr. no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3772 OF 2016 BHAUSAHEB S/O VISHNU GHODAK

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Rahul O.Awasarmol APP for Respondents: Mr. S.R. Yadav with CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5170 OF 2016 RAHUL S/O. POPATRAO BHOSALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.

...

Advocate for applicant : Mr. S.J. Salunke APP for respondent No.1 : Mr. S.Y. Mahajan.

Advocate for respondent No.2 : Mr. A.D. Aghav. . . .

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 25TH NOVEMBER, 2016.

PER COURT:

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent No.2.

2] Upon careful perusal of the allegations in the FIR, the ingredients of the alleged offences have been disclosed, which need investigation. No case is made out for interference by invoking extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court. Hence, both the applications stand rejected.

[K.K.SONAWANE] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-