Rameshwar Bhaskar Dandale v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 43-wp10689.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10689 OF 2016 Rameshwar Bhaskar Dandale ..Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

..Respondents -- Mr.S.A.Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner Mr.A.S.Shinde, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3 -- CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : NOVEMBER 24, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard.

2.

The petitioner has failed to pass the departmental examination within three chances during the stipulated period of nine years. Since the petitioner did not comply with the requirements of the relevant rules prescribing promotional avenues, he has not been considered for promotion along with respondent nos.4 to 11,

2 43-wp10689.odt who claimed to be juniors to the petitioner. The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal has considered all the relevant aspects and turned down the request of the petitioner.

3.

We are not inclined to entertain the petition in exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition is devoid of substance and as such, stands rejected.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.] kbp