← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8456/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Jairam Balaji Aadbe v. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Aurangabad Through Its Member Secretary And Others

2017-07-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice S C Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil2 pages

( 1 ) 908 wp 8456.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 WRIT PETITION NO. 8456 OF 2017 JAIRAM BALAJI AADBE

VERSUS

SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS MEMBER SECR ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Phatale Sagar S AGP for Respondents: Mr. A.R. Kale ...

CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

04.07.2017.

P.C. :- .

In view of the order passed by this Court today in Writ Petition No.8488/2017 (Rahul Sambhaji Admulwad vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) as well as the orders dated 27.06.2017 in Writ Petition No.8200/2017 (Mangesh Namdev Pentewad vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) and dated 16.06.2017 passed in Writ Petition No.7813/2017 (Chandrakant Gangadhar Yalpalwad vs. The State of Maharashtra and another), this Writ Petition is also disposed of with the following directions:- (a) The impugned order passed by the Scrutiny Committee invalidating the tribe/caste claim of the Petitioner is set aside.

( 2 ) 908 wp 8456.17 (b) We direct the competent Scrutiny Committee to scrutinize and verify the claim of the Petitioner as belonging to "MANNERVARLU" Scheduled Tribe (Entry 27) on merits and in accordance with law.

(c) The Scrutiny Committee should overlook the mistake and error in the spelling of the tribe/ caste in the certificate issued to the Petitioner.

(d) The Scrutiny Committee shall complete this assignment as expeditiously as possible.

(e) Till the Scrutiny Committee decides the matter and communicates it's order, the services of the Petitioner shall not be terminated on the ground that the Petitioner has failed to produce the validity certificate.

[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] mub