Mukesh Sayanna Koshakewar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

*1* wp-9237-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9237 OF 2017 DIPAK PRABHAKAR ABHALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9266 OF 2017 MUKESH SAYANNA KOSHAKEWAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 9269 OF 2017 ASHISH AVINASH PAKALWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Shri S.M. Vibhute in all WPs AGP for Respondents/ State : Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, Shri S.B. Yawalkar and Mr. P.S. Patil in respective WPs ...

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :- 25th July, 2017 P.C.:

In the light of the clarificatory letter from the Directorate of Technical Education addressed to all the Divisional Offices in the State of Maharashtra, namely, at Mumbai, Pune, Nashik, Aurangabad, Amravati

*2* wp-9237-2017 and Nagpur, none of the recognized Institutions shall insist on production of the validity certificate.

In the circumstances, the insistence in these cases by Respondent No.3/ Engineering College, respectively, is contrary to this directive. We, therefore, direct Respondent No.3/College to abide by the directives from the Director of Technical Education dated 19.07.2017 and permit the Petitioner/s to continue studies.

This order will mean that the fees should be accepted, the Petitioner/s be enrolled and admitted for further academic sessions/ terms, they should be allowed to appear for examinations, results be declared and even degree certificate be issued, but all this is subject to the pending proceedings before the Scrutiny Committee and the orders made therein.

The Writ Petitions are, accordingly, disposed of. arp/ (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)