Vinayak Nivrutti Kolhe v. The State Of Mah And ORS

1 Cr.W.P. 717....2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 717 OF 2012 VINAYAK NIVRUTTI KOLHE V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 718 OF 2012 SHESHRAO MURLIDHAR BHUSARI V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 775 OF 2012 MAHADEV TUKARAM LIPANE V/S THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

.............................

None for Petitioners.

Mr. V.D.Godbharle, A.P.P. for R - 1 State.

..............................

2 Cr.W.P. 717....2012 CORAM : V.M.DESHPANDE, J.

DATE : 2nd MARCH, 2015 .............................

PER COURT :

1.

In the present Writ Petitions, initially, Mr. P.B.Shirsath, the learned counsel used to appear for the petitioners. He filed application for getting himself discharged from the proceedings. Before filing said application, Mr. Shirsath has followed the procedure under the Advocate's Act. Therefore, on 12/02/2015, this Court has already discharged Mr. P.B.Shirsath from the proceedings. On the said date, it was observed by this Court that the petitioners were under obligation to make alternate arrangement. However, nobody was present. On that date itself, this Court could have proceeded against the petitioners. However, in order to grant opportunity to the petitioners, the matters were adjourned till this date. It appears that the petitioners have not made any alternate arrangement.

2.

The perusal of the Writ Petitions shows that the charge sheet is already filed before the competent Court. If the petitioners are of the view that there is no material available against them in the entire charge sheet, the course is open for the petitioners to file necessary application before the Court for getting themselves discharged from the proceedings.

3 Cr.W.P. 717....2012 3.

In that view of the matter, there is no merit in the Writ Petitions and hence the Writ Petitions are dismissed. [V.M.DESHPANDE, J.] KNP/Cr.W.P. 717....2012