Late Rajaram G Bagade Thr Lrs Sushilabai And ANR v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, I U.T.P.H And ANR

(1) 919- CA-4655-2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4655 OF 2021 IN FAST/19455/2020 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4653 OF 2021 IN FAST/19467/2020 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4654 OF 2021 IN FAST/19474/2020 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4652 OF 2021 IN FAST/19481/2020 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4649 OF 2021 IN FAST/20238/2020 SURESH LAXMAN PATIL (GPA) CHANDRABHAN AND ANR ....Applicants

VERSUS

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, I U.T.P.H AND ANR .....Respondents .....

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. M.M. Bhokrikar AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. R. D. Raut Advocate for Respondent No.2 : in CA4655/21 And CA No. 4652/21 : Mr. Sayed Parvez h/f Mr. A.G. Vasmatkar Advocate for Respondent No.2 : IN CA No 4653/21, 4654/21, 4649/21 : Mr. Anand Dale h/f Mr. P. S. Chavan ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 06 FEBRUARY , 2025

ORDER

1.

Heard rival submissions.

(2) 919- CA-4655-2021.odt 2.

The applicants in all these applications, are seeking condonation of delay of 122 days which appears to be caused due to their poor financial condition.

3.

The learned A.G.P. as well as learned counsel for Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay. 4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay of 122 days in these applications stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the period of aforesaid delay. 5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

6.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) Y.S. Kulkarni