Dattu Shivaji Karpe And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 1066, 1067 ca 3638-19+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1066 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3638 OF 2019 IN FAST/20530/2018 DATTU SHIVAJI KARPE AND ORS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. T. G. Gaikwad AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. B. V. Virdhe ...

AND 1067 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3640 OF 2019 IN FAST/20541/2018 SHIVAJI SAMBHAJI KARPE AND ORS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. T. G. Gaikwad AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. S. N. Kendre ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 31/01/2023.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned AGP strongly opposed the applications on the ground that there is also circulation delay.

2 1066, 1067 ca 3638-19+ 3.

Considering the statutory right of the applicants, the applications are allowed and the delay periods in all these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

4.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-