Uttam Sahebrao Karpe And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 961 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3636 OF 2019 IN FAST/22323/2018 GANPATI PANDURANG KARPE (DIED) THR LRS PARSURAM AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

AND 962 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3637 OF 2019 IN FAST/20536/2018 UTTAM SAHEBRAO KARPE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Gaikwad T. G.

AGP for Respondent/s - State : Mr. A. B. Chate, Mr. B.

V.

Virdhe respectively Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Ingole R. K. ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 15.02.2023 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned in both these matters which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned AGP as well as learned counsel for the Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that there is huge delay and also circulation delay.

2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay periods in both these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid periods of delay and also for the delay in circulating the matter, belatedly.

3.

Appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-