← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8971/2021disposed off

Pandurang Tukaram Thoke v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Others

2025-03-21Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:8517-DB 1 WP8971.2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8971 OF 2021 .

Pandurang Tukaram Thoke, Age: 65 Years, Occu.: Agril., R/o.: Anjandoha, Tq. Dharur, Dist. Beed .. Petitioner

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Revenue & Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 2.

The Collector, Collectorate, Beed 3.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer No.1, Ambajogai, Tq. Ambajogai, Dist. Beed Now Merged in The Sub - Divisional Officer, Sub-Division Majalgaon, Tq. Majalgaon, Dist. Beed 4.

The Executive Engineer, Majalgaon Irrigation Division, Parli Vadyanath, Tq. Parali Vaydyanath, Dist. Beed .. Respondents ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Dnyaneshwar A. Bide AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. A. V. Lavte Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. B. R. Survase ...

CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, C.J. & ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 21st MARCH, 2025

2 WP8971.2021 ORDER: [Per Arun R. Pedneker, J.] 1.

Heard.

2.

Although, the writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the State to initiate the land acquisition proceedings of the petitioner's land taken over by the State, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the acquisition proceedings are concluded and that the file is sent to the Collector for allocation of the funds.

3.

The learned AGP appearing for the State submits that they would conclude the process within a period of two (02) months and would disburse the amounts to the rightful claimants within the said period.

4.

The statement made by the learned AGP is accepted. 5.

In view of the statement made by the learned AGP appearing for the Respondent / State, the Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] marathe