Dada Bhau Barkade v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10971 OF 2016 (Dada Bhau Barkade Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) ---- Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for the respondent/State Mr. G.B. Rajale, Advocate for respondent No. 4 ---- CORAM :

T.V. NALAWADE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 7th FEBRUARY, 2017 PER COURT :

Heard.

2.

The learned counsel for respondent No. 4 - Acquiring Body made a statement that the amount of compensation has been deposited in the proceeding baring Special Darkhast No. 101/2012. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire amount of compensation is not deposited.

3.

It appears that there is dispute as to whether the entire amount of compensation as per the award is deposited. Such a point can be decided by the Executing

wp10971-2016 Court. In the circumstances, in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for respondent No. 4, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL] [T.V. NALAWADE] JUDGE JUDGE npj/wp10971-2016