← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8321/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Pankaj Kiran Waghmare Through Father Kiran Maruti Waghmare v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2019-07-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil2 pages

(1) 29-39-41

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 29 WRIT PETITION NO.8321 OF 2019 PANKAJ KIRAN WAGHMARE THROUGH FATHER KIRAN MARUTI WAGHMARE ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Madhur A. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. S. G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondents-State. ...

WITH 39 WRIT PETITION NO.8331 OF 2019 PRADNIKA KIRAN WAGHMARE ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Madhur A. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondents-State. ...

WITH 41 WRIT PETITION NO.8333 OF 2019 PANDIT KIRAN WAGHMARE ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Madhur A. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents-State. ...

(2) 29-39-41 CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED : 9th JULY, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

The learned counsel submits that the application for issuance of the caste certificate is pending with S.D.O., the same is not yet decided.

2.

The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for all respondents.

3.

In case, application filed by petitioners for issuance of caste certificate is pending with respondent no.2, then respondent no.2 shall decide the same on its own merits, in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a period of one month.

4.

Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

(MANGESH S. PATIL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/July-19